Re: [HACKERS] CVS head broken on win32?

2005-03-15 Thread Neil Conway
Tom Lane wrote: Um. Shouldn't that whole file be #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND? Woops, sorry about that. We can't make the file #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND since fork_process() is used by the Unix implementation of internal_forkexec(), but #ifndef WIN32 should work. I've applied the attached patch to HEAD. -Ne

Re: [HACKERS] CVS head broken on win32?

2005-03-15 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Hallgren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm trying to compile CVS HEAD on Win32. > postmaster/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x9d7):fork_process.c: undefined reference to > `fork' Um. Shouldn't that whole file be #ifndef EXEC_BACKEND? regards, tom lane ---

[HACKERS] CVS head broken on win32?

2005-03-15 Thread Thomas Hallgren
I'm trying to compile CVS HEAD on Win32. ./configure --enable-integer-datetimes make ... It ends with: postmaster/SUBSYS.o(.text+0x9d7):fork_process.c: undefined reference to `fork' gcc --version and uname -a gcc.exe (GCC) 3.4.1 (mingw special) MINGW32_NT-5.1 THHALHOME3 1.0.11(0.46/3/2) 2004-03-3