Re: [HACKERS] Catalog Access

2006-04-25 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:57:13AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: http://www.thelinuxreview.com/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00840.php O.k. I need to fix that... that should be an archives link ;0 http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hack

Re: [HACKERS] Catalog Access

2006-04-25 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 11:57:13AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > >http://www.thelinuxreview.com/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00840.php > > O.k. I need to fix that... that should be an archives link ;0 > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg00840.

Re: [HACKERS] Catalog Access

2006-04-25 Thread Joshua D. Drake
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 12:25:35PM -0500, Jim C. Nasby wrote: Is there anything in comments/docs/list archives about why catalog access uses a bunch of 'magic' instead of treating catalog tables the same as every other table? I realize that ultimately you have to bo