Re: [HACKERS] Cause of occasional buildfarm failures in sequence test

2008-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> So unless we want to just live with this test failing occasionally, >> it seems we have two choices: redesign the behavior of nextval() >> to be insensitive to checkpoint timing, or provide an alternat

Re: [HACKERS] Cause of occasional buildfarm failures in sequence test

2008-08-31 Thread Hannu Krosing
On Sun, 2008-08-31 at 13:17 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > The current result from buildfarm member pigeon > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pigeon&dt=2008-08-31%2008:04:54 > shows a symptom I've noticed a few times before: everything is fine > except that one "select * from sequence" s

[HACKERS] Cause of occasional buildfarm failures in sequence test

2008-08-31 Thread Tom Lane
The current result from buildfarm member pigeon http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=pigeon&dt=2008-08-31%2008:04:54 shows a symptom I've noticed a few times before: everything is fine except that one "select * from sequence" shows log_cnt = 31 instead of the expected 32. This is a bi