On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 13:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
What I'm inclined to do is remove the two % operators, which don't
seem likely to be performance-critical
Can you discuss what you see as the benefit or trade-offs for doing
that? Removing things tends to have major potential for annoying
Simon Riggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 2008-06-17 at 13:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
What I'm inclined to do is remove the two % operators, which don't
seem likely to be performance-critical
Can you discuss what you see as the benefit or trade-offs for doing
that? Removing things tends
There was a discussion back here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2008-01/msg00189.php
that came to the conclusion that cross-type operators are a bad idea
if they don't come in complete sets: if you don't have an exact match
to the input types, and there are multiple possible
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 01:29:56PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
...
What I'm inclined to do is remove the two % operators, which don't seem
likely to be performance-critical, and fill in the missing int2-vs-int8
cases for the four basic arithmetic operators. But I could be talked
into just nuking
