On Dec 19, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Dave Page wrote:
Thanks Greg - nice job! :-)
+1!
...Robert
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Thanks Greg - nice job! :-)
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Greg Smith wrote:
> CommitFest 2009-11 is now closed, having committed 27 patches in 33 days.
> For comparison sake, 2009-09 committed 20 patches in 29 days, 2009-07 37
> patches in 34 days, and 2008-09 29 patches in 30 days. The much
CommitFest 2009-11 is now closed, having committed 27 patches in 33
days. For comparison sake, 2009-09 committed 20 patches in 29 days,
2009-07 37 patches in 34 days, and 2008-09 29 patches in 30 days. The
much bigger 2008-11 involved 58 patches going on for months, the bulk of
it committed 2
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 Greg Smith wrote:
Sounds like we just are waiting for Simon to finish up, which is
expected to happen by tomorrow, and for Tom to wrap up working on the
ProcessUtility_hook. That makes the first reasonable date to consider
alpha3 packaging Thursday 12/17 I think.
Update:
Greg Smith writes:
> We're down to five patches that are ready for a committer still on the
> table:
> -tsearch parser inefficiency with urls or emails
I just looked at this one and concluded that it was pretty harmless;
will commit it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via p
On Tuesday 15 December 2009 20:44:36 Greg Smith wrote:
> As for the tsearch improvements, not to trivialize the patch, but I
> think this one will survive being committed between alpha3 & CF 2010-01
> if it doesn't make it in this week. Teodor can work on getting that
> committed when he has time,
Robert Haas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
-New VACUUM FULL
I get the impression there is still some discussion that needs to
happen about the design of this. I think we should mark it Returned
with Feedback for now, and let whoever ends up working on it r
Greg Smith writes:
> We're down to five patches that are ready for a committer still on the
> table:
> -New VACUUM FULL
> -tsearch parser inefficiency with urls or emails
> -ProcessUtility_hook
> -Aggregate ORDER BY support
> -Hot Standby
Aggregate ORDER BY is in. I will pick up the ProcessUti
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> -New VACUUM FULL
I get the impression there is still some discussion that needs to
happen about the design of this. I think we should mark it Returned
with Feedback for now, and let whoever ends up working on it resubmit
whatever ends up gett
We're down to five patches that are ready for a committer still on the
table:
-New VACUUM FULL
-tsearch parser inefficiency with urls or emails
-ProcessUtility_hook
-Aggregate ORDER BY support
-Hot Standby
I just bounced "Streaming Replication" forward to the next CF, and
specifically noted th
10 matches
Mail list logo
