On 8/5/16 11:58 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> For what it's worth, I tend to put the function body last. That's
> just my taste, though. Would it be hard to keep the ability to
> permute the stuff after
>
> CREATE FUNCTION (args)
> RETURNS [SETOF] type
>
> as we have it now?
I don't think
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 10:14:21AM -0400, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 7/3/16 11:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I can see the reasoning for
> > allowing COMMENT in a table column definition, but the argument for
> > allowing it in simpler CREATEs seems tissue-thin:
> >
> > CREATE FUNCTION foo(int)
On 7/3/16 11:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I can see the reasoning for
> allowing COMMENT in a table column definition, but the argument for
> allowing it in simpler CREATEs seems tissue-thin:
>
> CREATE FUNCTION foo(int) RETURNS ... ;
> COMMENT ON FUNCTION foo(int) IS 'blah';
>
> vs
>
>
David Fetter writes:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 01:06:49PM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
>> â+1 for the idea - though restricting it to columns would not be ideal.
> +1 for adding it to all the CREATEs whose objects support COMMENT.
TBH, I think this is a pretty bad idea. I can see the reaso
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello <
fabriziome...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Em sábado, 2 de julho de 2016, David G. Johnston <
> david.g.johns...@gmail.com> escreveu:
>
>> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> What I would prefer is something like t
On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 01:06:49PM -0400, David G. Johnston wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>
> >
> > What I would prefer is something like this:
> >
> > CREATE TABLE foo(
> > f1 int NOT NULL COMMENT
> > 'the first field',
> > f2 int NOT NULL COMMENT
> >
Em sábado, 2 de julho de 2016, David G. Johnston
escreveu:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Marko Tiikkaja > wrote:
>
>>
>> What I would prefer is something like this:
>>
>> CREATE TABLE foo(
>> f1 int NOT NULL COMMENT
>> 'the first field',
>> f2 int NOT NULL COMMENT
>> 'the second
On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 12:55 PM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
>
> What I would prefer is something like this:
>
> CREATE TABLE foo(
> f1 int NOT NULL COMMENT
> 'the first field',
> f2 int NOT NULL COMMENT
> 'the second field',
> ...
> );
>
> which would ensure the comments are both next to t
Hi,
Currently we have CREATE TABLE statements in a git repository that look
roughly like this:
CREATE TABLE foo(
-- the first field
f1 int NOT NULL,
-- the second field
f2 int NOT NULL,
...
);
But the problem is that those comments don't obviously make it all the
way to the database,
