On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 05:14:51PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> >> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >>> Arguably:
> >>>backend_start -> session_start
> >>>query_start -> statment_star
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 11:11:18PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> >> > Should we make any of these changes?
> >>
> >> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don't
> >> think is a problem. Besides, isn't the door for 9.2 changes now
> >> closed and bolted?
> >
> > Well, we re
Bruce Momjian writes:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>> Arguably:
>>>backend_start -> session_start
>>>query_start -> statment_start
>> Sounds like a lot of potential breakage to solve something I don
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 23:04, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
>> > think about these column names?
>> >
>> > backen
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:50:43PM +0100, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
> > think about these column names?
> >
> > backend_start | timestamp with time zone |
> > xact_sta
On 11 April 2012 21:46, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
> think about these column names?
>
> backend_start | timestamp with time zone |
> xact_start | timestamp with time zone |
> query_start | times
Since we are wacking around pg_stat_activity for 9.2, what do people
think about these column names?
backend_start| timestamp with time zone |
xact_start | timestamp with time zone |
query_start | timestamp with time zone |
Arguably:
backend_star
