On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:33 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> No, the column is very clearly labelled "Reviewers", not "Reviewer".
>> And we have certainly had patches with more than one person's name in
>> that field in the past. The issue is
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> No, the column is very clearly labelled "Reviewers", not "Reviewer".
> And we have certainly had patches with more than one person's name in
> that field in the past. The issue is rather that we don't have enough
> people reviewing. We haven
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>> The Good:
>> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.
>
> As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
> "A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for s
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:03 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> The Good:
> - Most patches still in play have a reviewer.
As far as I remember, there were discussions about the issue
"A patch has a reviewer, but in Needs Review state for several weeks "
in 9.0 development.
Do we have any plans for it? Ac
Folks,
We're almost half way through the commitfest, and so I'll start with:
The Good:
- Most patches still in play have a reviewer.
- It's possible for one person to post 5 reviews in a day. Robert
Haas actually did this on his own time yesterday.
- New people have been reviewing patches,
