Josh Berkus wrote:
Hackers,
At this point, almost all patches have been assigned to reviewers. If
you submitted a patch and don't get feedback by Saturday, take a look at
who's in the "reviewers" column and send them a query. Since I have no
way to track when patches are assigned to reviewe
Josh Berkus wrote:
Josh is probably basing that on the long history of
discussion/revision cycles.
Yep, and that *I* don't understand what the patch does, so I'm not going to
turn a newbie reviewer loose on it.
Here is a quick overview, there are two parts to the patch:
1. event system
T
> Josh is probably basing that on the long history of
> discussion/revision cycles.
Yep, and that *I* don't understand what the patch does, so I'm not going to
turn a newbie reviewer loose on it.
--
--Josh
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL
San Francisco
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-h
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The patch looks OK to me as it was the last time I looked at it; maybe
>> Tom has more comments, so I decided against just committing it.
>
> I haven't got round to looking at it in this fest. If anyone else wants
> to look it
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Merlin Moncure escribió:
>> Alvaro actually performed a review on libpq events. We are waiting on
>> his feedback on our changes (based on his review) and the newly
>> submitted documentation. I'll update the wiki accordingly. I wasn't
>> sure if Alva
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Actually a minor gripe ... should PQsetvalue be PQsetValue? :-)
We were mimicing PQgetvalue, which uses a lowercase 'v'. Is there a
preference, none on this end.
--
Andrew Chernow
eSilo, LLC
every bit counts
http://www.esilo.com/
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing li
Merlin Moncure escribió:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Some patches have not been assigned to reviewers for various reasons. The
> > following weren't assigned because they are complex and really need a
> > high-end hacker or committer to take them on
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some patches have not been assigned to reviewers for various reasons. The
> following weren't assigned because they are complex and really need a
> high-end hacker or committer to take them on:
>
> libpq events
Alvaro actual
Josh Berkus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Also, note that the following patches need performance testing on a
> variety of platforms. Everyone should help with this.
> GSoC Improved Hash Indexing
> posix fadvises
> operator restrictivity function for text search
> CLUSTER using sort instead of in
Hackers,
At this point, almost all patches have been assigned to reviewers. If
you submitted a patch and don't get feedback by Saturday, take a look at
who's in the "reviewers" column and send them a query. Since I have no
way to track when patches are assigned to reviewers, I have no idea i
10 matches
Mail list logo
