Brendan Jurd wrote:
But I also agree with Josh Drake's comment about a single point of
entry. If patch authors are updating the wiki, and reviewers are
using the wiki to guide their efforts, what purpose does the -patches
mailing list serve? Does sending an email to -patches on top of
submittin
On 08/03/2008, Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
> wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know that's
> true at least for me. If I want people to review my patch, I'm ready to
> sing and dan
This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author
has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off
patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get
applied right away, but not all.
Just a thought... maybe a distinction should be
Tom Lane wrote:
This is reasonable for the sort of medium-to-large patch that the author
has put a lot of time into. But we also get a lot of small one-off
patches where it's not so reasonable. Now of course many of those get
applied right away, but not all. One of the services that Bruce's pa
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sure, we can refine that later. making it easier for patch authors as
> well, but I don't think it's an unreasonable amount of work to keep one
> line per patch up-to-date in a wiki. The line doesn't need to contain
> anything else than title of
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
If I want people to review my patch, I'm ready to sing and dance if
that's what it takes.
Great timing, there's even a suitable song available for you today:
http://use.perl.org/~grantm/journal/35855
--
* Greg Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.
Andrew Chernow wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I think this makes the most sense. It dis
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I agree with Heikki that for the process to be successful, it should
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
th
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
The main point of my proposal is: let's make the *authors* who want
their stuff to be reviewed as part of a commitfest do the extra work.
There would be no extra work required for patch reviewers.
I think this makes the most sense. It distributes the work to auth
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
that's true at least for me.
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
> "Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
> > wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
> > that's true at least for me. If I wan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:46:24 +
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we'll have more success convincing patch authors to update a
> wiki page, than we'll have to convince reviewers to do so. I know
> that's true at least for m
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:33:02 +
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
practice. May I suggest that:
1. When a patch author wants to have a patch r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:33:02 +
"Heikki Linnakangas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
> practice. May I suggest that:
>
> 1. When a patch author wants to have a patch reviewed in the nex
It's not clear how this commitfest thing is supposed to work in
practice. May I suggest that:
1. When a patch author wants to have a patch reviewed in the next
commitfest, he posts it to pgsql-patches as usual, and then adds it to
the list on the Todo:PatchStatus page (or perhaps even better,
16 matches
Mail list logo
