Noah, Fujii, all,
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
> At the C level, have a pgstattuple function and a pgstattuple_v1_4 function.
> Let them differ only in that the former has a superuser check. Binary
> upgrades will use the former, and fresh CREATE EXTENSION shall use the latter.
Attach
Noah,
* Noah Misch (n...@leadboat.com) wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > > Currently only superusers can call pgstattuple().
> >
> > I started looking into this.
> >
> > If we were starting from a green fi
On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 10:27:02PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Currently only superusers can call pgstattuple().
>
> I started looking into this.
>
> If we were starting from a green field, the pg_dump dump catalog ACLs
> patch would work just fi
Fujii,
* Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Possibly, but I'd need to look at them more closely than I have time to
> > right now. Can you provide a use-case? That would certainly help.
>
> I have seen the monitoring system wh
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 5:36 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Michael,
>
> * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This
>> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much
>> progress. This thread is idle f
Michael,
* Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Will there be any work on this patch for this commit fest or not? This
> is being carried around for a couple of months now with not much
> progress. This thread is idle for 4 months now.
This thread and the other one kind of merged.
Stephen,
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Fujii,
> >
> > * Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >> he documents of the functions which the corresponding default roles
> >> are added by this patch need to be
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 3:46 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Fujii,
>
> * Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> he documents of the functions which the corresponding default roles
>> are added by this patch need to be updated. For example, the description
>> of pg_xlog_replay_pause() says "Paus
Fujii,
* Fujii Masao (masao.fu...@gmail.com) wrote:
> he documents of the functions which the corresponding default roles
> are added by this patch need to be updated. For example, the description
> of pg_xlog_replay_pause() says "Pauses recovery immediately (restricted
> to superusers).". I think
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> All,
>
> This patch gets smaller and smaller.
>
> Upon reflection I realized that, with default roles, it's entirely
> unnecssary to change how the permission checks happen today- we can
> simply add checks to them to be looking at role memb
Robert Haas writes:
> Now, if six people who are all well-known PostgreSQL contributors show
> up and they all say "I looked at the latest version of this carefully
> and I'm confident you've got it right", then go ahead: push it. But
> don't make the mistake of thinking that because you're confi
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
>> Yes: let's punt this to 9.6. The decisions you're making here are way
>> too significant to be making a couple of days before feature freeze,
>> and this patch has changed massively since it w
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yes: let's punt this to 9.6. The decisions you're making here are way
> too significant to be making a couple of days before feature freeze,
> and this patch has changed massively since it was first submitted.
> There isn't time now for people who wan
On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:16:39AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
>
> Yes: let's punt this to 9.6. The decisions you're making here are way
> too significant to be making a couple of days before feature fr
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Thoughts? Comments? Suggestions?
Yes: let's punt this to 9.6. The decisions you're making here are way
too significant to be making a couple of days before feature freeze,
and this patch has changed massively since it was first submitted
All,
This patch gets smaller and smaller.
Upon reflection I realized that, with default roles, it's entirely
unnecssary to change how the permission checks happen today- we can
simply add checks to them to be looking at role membership also. That's
removed the last of my concerns regarding any A
All,
* Stephen Frost (sfr...@snowman.net) wrote:
> Starting a new thread, as suggested by Robert, for consideration of
> adding default roles for sets of administrative functions, therefore
> removing the need for superuser-level roles in many use-cases.
[...]
> This is part 2 and really the "gu
All,
Starting a new thread, as suggested by Robert, for consideration of
adding default roles for sets of administrative functions, therefore
removing the need for superuser-level roles in many use-cases.
This reserves the prefix 'pg_' as being for default roles.
Having these default roles also
18 matches
Mail list logo
