Re: [HACKERS] Dense index?

2014-08-27 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:16 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > I know that the alignment is required for faster memory access, but > sometimes we may want to save disk space for index to save I/O because > these days customers want to handle huge number of rows. To make index > more "dense", can we add a

Re: [HACKERS] Dense index?

2014-08-27 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> Only if you want it to crash hard on most non-Intel architectures. Of course some CPU architecture prohibits none word boundary access and we need to do either: 1) do not allow to use the option on such an architecture 2) work hard to use temporary buffer which is properly aligned Best regard

Re: [HACKERS] Dense index?

2014-08-27 Thread Tom Lane
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > I know that the alignment is required for faster memory access, but > sometimes we may want to save disk space for index to save I/O because > these days customers want to handle huge number of rows. To make index > more "dense", can we add an option something like "dense in

[HACKERS] Dense index?

2014-08-27 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
While looking into pg_filedump output of int4 btree index, It strikes me that in leaf pages about 25% of page is wasted because of 8 byte alignment (MAXALIGN on 64bit architecture): an index tuple consists of 8 byte tuple header + 4 byte key + 4 byte alignment, thus 4/(8+4+4) = 25% is waste. I kno