On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 09:03:29AM +0100, Michael Paesold wrote:
> Elein wrote:
> >http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/128.php
> >
> >Known Problems and Issues:
> >
> > * Creating the table with an email PRIMARY KEY did not use our
> >comparison function. It was necessary to create a unique index
Elein wrote:
http://www.varlena.com/GeneralBits/128.php
Known Problems and Issues:
* Creating the table with an email PRIMARY KEY did not use our
comparison function. It was necessary to create a unique index which
explicitly used the email operator class.
* ORDER BY requires USING op
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:34:02AM -0800, elein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:26:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > I've got a domain based on a text type.
> > > I've overridden the equal operator with
> > > lower(text) = lower(text).
> >
> > This won't w
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:34:21PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:36:41PM -0800, elein wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:29:35PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:59:35PM -0800, elein wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 0
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:36:41PM -0800, elein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:29:35PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:59:35PM -0800, elein wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > > ORDER BY x ASC is a synon
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 04:35:56PM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> Have you looked at the code of citext? Unless I'm misreading, it creates
> a lowercase copy of each string for each comparison. And it doesn't look
> to me like it's encoding/locale aware.
Its cilower function isn't terribly great
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:29:35PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:59:35PM -0800, elein wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > > ORDER BY x ASC is a synonym for ORDER BY x USING >. That's the way it
> > > is currently
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:34:02AM -0800, elein wrote:
Actually I can do and have done this. It is being tested now.
I did create an opclass. It creates a UNIQUE index just fine
for the type using the lower() functionality. *If* it passes
all of my testing
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 12:59:35PM -0800, elein wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > ORDER BY x ASC is a synonym for ORDER BY x USING >. That's the way it
> > is currently. To use ORDER BY by itself you need to call your operators
> > < and >.
> >
>
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:34:02AM -0800, elein wrote:
> > Actually I can do and have done this. It is being tested now.
> > I did create an opclass. It creates a UNIQUE index just fine
> > for the type using the lower() fu
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 10:34:02AM -0800, elein wrote:
> Actually I can do and have done this. It is being tested now.
> I did create an opclass. It creates a UNIQUE index just fine
> for the type using the lower() functionality. *If* it passes
> all of my testing I'll publish it tomorrow on ge
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:26:31AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've got a domain based on a text type.
> > I've overridden the equal operator with
> > lower(text) = lower(text).
>
> This won't work, you need to make a type instead.
>
Actually I can do and have
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 09:27:47PM -0800, elein wrote:
> I've got a domain based on a text type.
> I've overridden the equal operator with
> lower(text) = lower(text).
>
> I created a table containing my new domain type
> and can see that the equals operator is not
> being used to determine unique
elein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've got a domain based on a text type.
> I've overridden the equal operator with
> lower(text) = lower(text).
This won't work, you need to make a type instead.
> If this is the way domains really are, I would strongly suggest
> expanding create domain to merge
I've got a domain based on a text type.
I've overridden the equal operator with
lower(text) = lower(text).
I created a table containing my new domain type
and can see that the equals operator is not
being used to determine uniqueness.
What do I need to do to force the UNIQUE constraint
to use the
15 matches
Mail list logo
