Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-24 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Jonathan Katz writes: > > I see this one > > > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a > > multixact with exactly one still-interesting member > > But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted. > > I'm not sure about that eit

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-06 Thread Jonathan Katz
> On Aug 5, 2017, at 5:37 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Jonathan Katz writes: >> I see this one >> > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a >> multixact with exactly one still-interesting member >> But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted.

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Andres Freund writes: > I just pushed a 9.4 specific bugfix. Do you want me to fix up the > release notes after you backpatch the minor release to 9.4, or what's > the best process? No sweat, I'll incorporate it when I do the further-back-branch notes tomorrow. regards, t

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-05 Thread Andres Freund
Hi Tom, On 2017-08-04 18:41:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 I just pushed a 9.4 specific bugfix. Do you want me to fix up the release notes after you backpatch

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-05 Thread Tom Lane
Jonathan Katz writes: > I see this one > > Fix potential data corruption when freezing a tuple whose XMAX is a > multixact with exactly one still-interesting member > But I’m unsure how prevalent it is and if it should be highlighted. I'm not sure about that either. I do not think anyone

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-05 Thread Jonathan Katz
Hi Tom, > On Aug 4, 2017, at 6:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at > https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 > > (If you prefer to read nicely-marked-up copy, they should be up at > https://www.postgresql

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2017-08-04 Thread Tom Lane
I've committed the first-draft release notes for 9.6.4 at https://git.postgresql.org/pg/commitdiff/03378c4da598840b0520a53580dd7713c95f21c8 (If you prefer to read nicely-marked-up copy, they should be up at https://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-6-4.html in a couple hours from now.

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-05-16 Thread Tom Lane
I've committed first-draft release notes for next week's back-branch releases. As usual, I've made a section for 9.4.2 that currently includes items for all branches; I'll subdivide the items tomorrow. If you wish to review, please send comments in the next 18 hours or so. Patch is up now at http

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: > First draft of release notes for the upcoming minor releases is committed > at > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=77e9125e847adf76e9466814781957c0f32d8554 > It should be visible on the documentation website after guaibasaurus does > its next buildfarm run

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-01-31 Thread Amit Langote
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Amit Langote writes: >> Perhaps the following two missed? > >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=deadbf4f3324f7b2826cac60dd212dfa1b0084ec > >> http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=cd63c57e5cbfc

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
Amit Langote writes: > Perhaps the following two missed? > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=deadbf4f3324f7b2826cac60dd212dfa1b0084ec > http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commit;h=cd63c57e5cbfc16239aa6837f8b7043a721cdd28 Hm? Those are both included

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-01-31 Thread Amit Langote
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Please let me know of any corrections ASAP. > > Note that I've been fairly ruthless about removing items altogether if > they were unlikely to have clear user-visible impact, because the notes > were eye-glazingly long already. Please mention it

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2015-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
First draft of release notes for the upcoming minor releases is committed at http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=commitdiff;h=77e9125e847adf76e9466814781957c0f32d8554 It should be visible on the documentation website after guaibasaurus does its next buildfarm run, a couple hours

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-20 Thread Noah Misch
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 08:29:38PM +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch) > > I'm not familiar with the phrase "Shore up", I think it should use > more precise language: are the privilege

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-19 Thread Marti Raudsepp
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 10:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Sorry I'm late. > Shore up GRANT ... WITH ADMIN OPTION restrictions (Noah Misch) I'm not familiar with the phrase "Shore up", I think it should use more precise language: are

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-17 Thread Tom Lane
Josh Berkus writes: > On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at >> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html >> Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? > Major: > Do we have an expla

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-17 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Josh Berkus wrote: > On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at > > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html > > Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? > > Major: > > Do we have an

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-16 Thread Josh Berkus
On 02/16/2014 03:41 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at > http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html > Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? Major: Do we have an explantion of what a multixact is,

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2014-02-16 Thread Tom Lane
Draft release notes for 9.3.3 are committed and can be read at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/release-9-3-3.html Any comments before I start transposing them into the back branches? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@post

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-04-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 08:28:22AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > 2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: > >Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the > >release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's > >releases, covering commits through today. T

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-04-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: > doc/src/sgml/release.sgml suggest using the last one but when I looked at > release-9.3, I saw "(AlvaroAacute;lvaro Herrera)" in the webpage several times > where the sgml contains "(Álvaro Herrera)", so it's not bulletproof > e

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-04-21 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2013-04-21 08:28 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta: 2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committe

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-04-20 Thread Boszormenyi Zoltan
2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed into the master branch for review, and should show up

Re: [HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-03-28 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: > Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the > release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's > releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed > into the master branch for review, and should show up at > http://www.postgre

[HACKERS] Draft release notes up for review

2013-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed into the master branch for review, and should show up at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/