On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:03 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> That's what I thought. Can a dynamic background worker start *another*
> dynamic background worker, or can they only be started from "first level"
> background workers?
I have never really tried by myself, but I don't see any reason why it
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Magnus Hagander
> wrote:
> > I was looking at
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bgworker.html
> > with a client today.
> >
> > It says:
> > "Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:54 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I was looking at http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bgworker.html
> with a client today.
>
> It says:
> "Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be called from within the
> postmaster,RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker must be
I was looking at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/bgworker.htmlwith a client
today.
It says:
"Unlike RegisterBackgroundWorker, which can only be called from within the
postmaster,RegisterDynamicBackgroundWorker must be called from a regular
backend."
Is that the correct restriction? In
