On 2015-01-13 20:21:55 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
> > guessing that's it.
>
> Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
> but the number
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
>> guessing that's it.
> Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
> but the number of affected people should be pre
On 2015-01-13 11:10:06 -0800, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> EXEC_BACKEND on Windows doesn't actually use a tempfile though, so I'm
> guessing that's it.
Ah! Then this really is fairly harmless. Will fix and backpatch anyway,
but the number of affected people should be pretty much zero.
Greetings,
And
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Andres Freund
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Currently the combination from $subject fails for me with "could not
> read from backend variables file ...".
>
> The origin for that problem seems to be b94ce6e80 which moved
> RemovePgTempFiles() to after SysLogger_Start(). Unless
Hi,
Currently the combination from $subject fails for me with "could not
read from backend variables file ...".
The origin for that problem seems to be b94ce6e80 which moved
RemovePgTempFiles() to after SysLogger_Start(). Unless the syslogger
starts up very quickly RemovePgTempFiles() will have d
