Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tuesday 25 November 2008 16:42:57 Tom Lane wrote:
>> ! putenv("PGOPTIONS=--intervalstyle=postgres_verbose");
>> So I guess the real question is what is the
>> use case for having pg_regress talk to older servers?
> There is no use. I was j
On Tuesday 25 November 2008 16:42:57 Tom Lane wrote:
> --- 716,722
> */
> putenv("PGTZ=PST8PDT");
> putenv("PGDATESTYLE=Postgres, MDY");
> ! putenv("PGOPTIONS=--intervalstyle=postgres_verbose");
>
> if (temp_install)
> {
>
> when it struck me that
I wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (What is the use case for this variable anyway? Is it there just
>> because PGDATESTYLE was there previously?)
> Pretty much. I'd be fine with taking it out entirely.
Actually ... I started to take this out and replace
*** pgsql/src/t
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Exporting PGINTERVALSTYLE causes errors of the following kind when
> connecting to an older server version:
> psql: FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "intervalstyle"
Ooops.
> (What is the use case for this variable anyway? Is it there j
Exporting PGINTERVALSTYLE causes errors of the following kind when
connecting to an older server version:
psql: FATAL: unrecognized configuration parameter "intervalstyle"
Should the processing of this variable be made conditional upon the
server version?
(What is the use case for this vari
