Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't think my patch against recent sources would apply cleanly to
> older ones, and I didn't run the regression against it, but it seemed
> to work, and is only a two line change in current source.
This patch needs more work. You are assuming that
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Tom Lane wrote:
> Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I don't think my patch against recent sources would apply cleanly to
> > older ones, and I didn't run the regression against it, but it seemed
> > to work, and is only a two line change in current source.
>
> Th
Dave Cramer writes:
> Apparently bigint is not really 8 bytes???
It's sort of 7.999 bytes.
> test=# update testbigint set fp0 = -9223372036854775808 where id = 1;
> ERROR: int8 value out of range: "-9223372036854775808"
This is a bug in the int8 value parser. While it reads the string it
alw
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Dave Cramer wrote:
> This came into the jdbc list
>
> Apparently bigint is not really 8 bytes???
>
> I test this out with psql
>
> test=# create table testbigint (id serial, fp0 int8);
> NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 'testbigint_id_seq'
> for SERIAL c
This came into the jdbc list
Apparently bigint is not really 8 bytes???
I test this out with psql
test=# create table testbigint (id serial, fp0 int8);
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE will create implicit sequence 'testbigint_id_seq'
for SERIAL column 'testbigint.id'
NOTICE: CREATE TABLE/UNIQUE will cre
