Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-12 Thread Jason Tishler
Joel, On Fri, May 10, 2002 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Joel Burton wrote: Sorry, but since I install all Cygwin packages plus about 30 additional ones I haven't desire to determine what are the minimal requirements. If no one else has done this, I'll be happy to dig in and answer this.

[HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Dave Page
Some comments from Jason Tishler the Cygwin-PostgreSQL maintainer... -Original Message- From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 10 May 2002 15:00 To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Dave, Would you forward

Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwards: 4. Cygwin PostgreSQL is perceived to have poor performance. I have never done any benchmarks regarding this issue, but apparently Terry Carlin (from the defunct Great Bridge) did: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-cygwin/2001-08/msg00029.php

Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions

2002-05-10 Thread Joel Burton
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tom Lane Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 12:31 PM To: Dave Page Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [HACKERS] FW: Cygwin PostgreSQL Information and Suggestions Dave Page [EMAIL