Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-04 Thread Cyril VELTER
> >Here are the up-to-date platforms: > >AIX 4.3.3 RS6000 7.1 2001-03-21, Gilles Darold >BeOS 5.0.4 x86 7.1 2000-12-18, Cyril Velter I just checked RC2 on BeOS and everything is OK except the Horlogy test (regarding previous discussions, it seems to be normal ?) cyril select ve

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Adriaan Joubert
> Compaq Tru64 4.0g Alpha 7.1 2001-03-19, Brent Verner We ran these regression tests with both native cc and gcc -- worth mentioning that both work. Adriaan ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropr

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Nathan Myers
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:31:25PM +, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > > OK. So we are close to a final tally of supported machines. > ... > Here are the up-to-date platforms: > > AIX 4.3.3 RS6000 7.1 2001-03-21, Gilles Darold > BeOS 5.0.4 x86 7.1 2000-12-18, Cyril Velter > BSDI 4.01 x86

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Tom Lane
Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Not sure how to test the "implicit time zone" feature of "TIME WITH TIME > ZONE" without risking the same kinds of trouble. Maybe the test should > be recast to using only comparisons with other date/time types which > have been shown to behave themsel

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> Thoughts? Besides "Thomas is an idiot"? :) Not sure how to test the "implicit time zone" feature of "TIME WITH TIME ZONE" without risking the same kinds of trouble. Maybe the test should be recast to using only comparisons with other date/time types which have been shown to behave themselves a

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread bpalmer
> > I just ran the "make check" (paralell regression tests) - instead of the > "make installcheck" that I'd run previously... > > [nobody@web-cache regress]$ grep 'FAILED' regression.out > test geometry ... FAILED > test horology ... FAILED > > The relevant diff for horolog

Re: [HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Dominic J. Eidson
On Tue, 3 Apr 2001, Thomas Lockhart wrote: [Snip] > Linux 2.0.x MIPS 7.1 2001-03-30, Dominic Eidson I just ran the "make check" (paralell regression tests) - instead of the "make installcheck" that I'd run previously... [nobody@web-cache regress]$ grep 'FAILED' regression.out test geometry

[HACKERS] Final call for platform testing

2001-04-03 Thread Thomas Lockhart
> > mklinux has failed Tatsuo's testing afaicr. Demote to unsupported? > Yes. But you'd better to change mklinux -> MkLinux DR1. There may be > a chance that latest MkLinux or gcc successfully runs 7.1... OK. So we are close to a final tally of supported machines. The "unsupported machines" are