Re: [HACKERS] Fixing the libxml memory allocation situation

2009-05-18 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout writes: > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:55:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I've about come to the conclusion that the only real fix is to abandon >> our attempt to manage libxml's memory usage. > Perhaps we could suggest to the libxml authors that it would be nice of > the allo

Re: [HACKERS] Fixing the libxml memory allocation situation

2009-05-18 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 05:55:13PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > I've been poking at the problems described here: > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090306191404.gk3...@alvh.no-ip.org > http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/5265.1240417...@sss.pgh.pa.us > > I've about come to the conclus

[HACKERS] Fixing the libxml memory allocation situation

2009-05-12 Thread Tom Lane
I've been poking at the problems described here: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20090306191404.gk3...@alvh.no-ip.org http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/5265.1240417...@sss.pgh.pa.us I've about come to the conclusion that the only real fix is to abandon our attempt to manage libxm