Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-22 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the packages before I leave for PGEast. My only hesitation about this is

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-22 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being noticeably less broken than they were in alpha4. How much less broken are they now? I think the core code is only

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-17 Thread Robert Haas
2011/3/16 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 22:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and collation support are both still pretty broken.  Should we just not worry about that for alpha? FWIW, collations are probably

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-15 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: My vote would be forget about building installers for alpha4 and instead wrap an alpha5 next week. If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the packages before I leave for PGEast. Regards, -- Devrim GÜNDÜZ

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-15 Thread Robert Haas
2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 11:40 -0500, Robert Haas wrote: My vote would be forget about building installers for alpha4 and instead wrap an alpha5 next week. If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the packages before I leave for

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-15 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the packages before I leave for PGEast. My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and collation support are both still pretty

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-15 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2011/3/15 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: If you need more votes for this: +1 from me. I'd like to wrap the packages before I leave for PGEast. My only hesitation about this is

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-15 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 22:00 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: My only hesitation about this is that it seems like sync rep and collation support are both still pretty broken. Should we just not worry about that for alpha? FWIW, collations are probably still several days away from being

[HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Page
I'm seeing this failure on a build machine with an old (and therefore unusable) version of flex: gcc -O2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wdeclaration-after-statement -Wendif-labels -Wformat-security -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -I../../../src/include -D_GNU_SOURCE

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Heikki Linnakangas
On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball. Yes. Tom spotted and fixed this yesterday: commit 174f65ab00bb8de0f119a6a60d562b516ba71bba Author: Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us Date: Thu Mar 10 00:03:26 2011 -0500 Fix some oversights

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Page
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Heikki Linnakangas heikki.linnakan...@enterprisedb.com wrote: On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball. Yes. Tom spotted and fixed this yesterday: I really should pay more attention to the committers

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Devrim GÜNDÜZ
On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:45 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball. Yes. Tom spotted and fixed this yesterday: I believe we need an alpha5 for post-alpha-4 fixes, including syncrep ones.

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Page
2011/3/11 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:45 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball. Yes. Tom spotted and fixed this yesterday: I believe we need an alpha5 for

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Robert Haas
2011/3/11 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org: 2011/3/11 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:45 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball. Yes. Tom spotted and fixed this yesterday:

Re: [HACKERS] Flex output missing from 9.1a4 tarballs?

2011-03-11 Thread Dave Page
2011/3/11 Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com: 2011/3/11 Dave Page dp...@pgadmin.org: 2011/3/11 Devrim GÜNDÜZ dev...@gunduz.org: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 17:45 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: On 11.03.2011 17:41, Dave Page wrote: Looks like we're missing the pre-build output from the tarball.