Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key references to non-primary key columns

2000-12-06 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings, and thanks so much for your reply! Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 5 Dec 2000, Camm Maguire wrote: > > > Greetings! I've noticed in the documentation that the sql standard > > requires foreign keys to reference primary key/(or maybe just unique) > > columns, but tha

Re: [HACKERS] Foreign key references to non-primary key columns

2000-12-05 Thread Stephan Szabo
On 5 Dec 2000, Camm Maguire wrote: > Greetings! I've noticed in the documentation that the sql standard > requires foreign keys to reference primary key/(or maybe just unique) > columns, but that postgresql does not enforce this. Is this a feature > that is intended to persist, or a temporary

[HACKERS] Foreign key references to non-primary key columns

2000-12-05 Thread Camm Maguire
Greetings! I've noticed in the documentation that the sql standard requires foreign keys to reference primary key/(or maybe just unique) columns, but that postgresql does not enforce this. Is this a feature that is intended to persist, or a temporary deviation from the sql standard? The current