Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Manfred Spraul wrote:
> > Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> >
> > >-On [20030908 23:52], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>Why would FreeBSD have a "library of thread-safe libc functions" (libc_r)
> > >>if the functions weren't thread-safe? I thi
Manfred Spraul wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
>
> >-On [20030908 23:52], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Why would FreeBSD have a "library of thread-safe libc functions" (libc_r)
> >>if the functions weren't thread-safe? I think the test is faulty.
> >>
> >>
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On [20030908 23:52], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Why would FreeBSD have a "library of thread-safe libc functions" (libc_r)
if the functions weren't thread-safe? I think the test is faulty.
A thread-safe library has a per-thread errno value (i
-On [20030908 23:52], Peter Eisentraut ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>Why would FreeBSD have a "library of thread-safe libc functions" (libc_r)
>if the functions weren't thread-safe? I think the test is faulty.
Having libc_r is not a guarantee that all functions of libc are
represented in that libra
Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Both gethostbyname() and getpwuid() have no _r equivalents on
> > FreeBSD-STABLE, ergo no thread-safe functions of these.
>
> So you don't have all the *_r functions, and your non-*_r functions
> aren't thread-safe. Should we disable theading on FreeBSD? Seems so.
Why
-On [20030908 18:52], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>So you don't have all the *_r functions, and your non-*_r functions
>aren't thread-safe. Should we disable theading on FreeBSD? Seems so.
Exactly. Most other threading works though. :)
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai
--On Monday, September 08, 2003 12:50:18 -0400 Bruce Momjian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
-On [20030908 06:32], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
>> Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
>> Your functions are _not_ a
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
> -On [20030908 06:32], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >> Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
> >> Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
> >> Your functions are _not_ all thread-safe
> >
> >Interesting. Do you have all the *_r files listed in thread.c
-On [20030908 06:32], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
>> Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
>> Your functions are _not_ all thread-safe
>
>Interesting. Do you have all the *_r files listed in thread.c? I sure
>hope so. I assume you used the
Christopher Kings-Lynne wrote:
> FreeBSD 4.8/i386:
>
> Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
> Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
> Your functions are _not_ all thread-safe
Interesting. Do you have all the *_r files listed in thread.c? I sure
hope so. I assume you used the template threa
FreeBSD 4.8/i386:
Your gethostbyname() is _not_ thread-safe
Your getpwuid() is _not_ thread-safe
Your functions are _not_ all thread-safe
Chris
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Kurt Roeckx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, Se
11 matches
Mail list logo
