On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 01:27:26PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:42AM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:42:43PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > > Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Links to results are here:
> > > > 7.5devel - http:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 10:01:42AM -0700, Mark Wong wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:42:43PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> > Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Links to results are here:
> > > 7.5devel - http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/128/
> > > 8.0beta3 - http:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 02:42:43PM -0400, Greg Stark wrote:
> Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Links to results are here:
> > 7.5devel - http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/128/
> > 8.0beta3 - http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/180/
>
> Are those cy
Mark Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Links to results are here:
> 7.5devel - http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/128/
> 8.0beta3 - http://www.osdl.org/projects/dbt2dev/results/dev4-010/180/
Are those cyclic spikes an artifact of the load of the tests? Or are they
artifacts of
I was comparing the oprofile results of our OLTP workload between
7.5devel and 8.0beta3 test and noticed a new FunctionCall2 in the
8.0beta3 profile that's on the top of the list for PostgreSQL. I
see about an 32% decrease in overall performance. Any suggestions
for determining if FunctionCall2
