Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database

2005-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:27:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> For working with a beta release, --enable-cassert isn't a bad idea >> either, though it is probably not relevant to your problem. > Also, note that --enable-cassert will reduce performance som

Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database

2005-10-05 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Wed, Oct 05, 2005 at 02:27:32PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The software we are running is a build from the beta2 release, with > > no special options specified at ./configure time. Would you expect > > such a build to include the debug info you wan

Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database

2005-10-05 Thread Tom Lane
"Kevin Grittner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The software we are running is a build from the beta2 release, with > no special options specified at ./configure time. Would you expect > such a build to include the debug info you wanted? No, you need configure --enable-debug, which is not the defa

Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: 8.1beta2 vacuum analyze hanging on idle database

2005-10-05 Thread Kevin Grittner
I see that my initial post never made it through to the list. I assume this was some technical failure, so I'm adding it back for this reply. It doesn't appear that we did stop postmaster between incidents. We have now done so. The software we are running is a build from the beta2 release, wit