Re: [HACKERS] GRANT on functions/languages

2002-10-10 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I was looking for consistency so we could have things ready if we > > tighten up in 7.4. I believe someone volunteered to fix them all so I > > figured we should do that. > > Someone did volunteer, but I haven't seen results. My po

Re: [HACKERS] GRANT on functions/languages

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I was looking for consistency so we could have things ready if we > tighten up in 7.4. I believe someone volunteered to fix them all so I > figured we should do that. Someone did volunteer, but I haven't seen results. My point is that it's not importa

Re: [HACKERS] GRANT on functions/languages

2002-10-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Now that we have relaxed the restriction on functions/languages, should > > we make sure we have GRANTS for all of them, including /contrib, or > > remove them all. > > I feel no strong need to do anything. The contrib entries that

Re: [HACKERS] GRANT on functions/languages

2002-10-09 Thread Tom Lane
Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now that we have relaxed the restriction on functions/languages, should > we make sure we have GRANTS for all of them, including /contrib, or > remove them all. I feel no strong need to do anything. The contrib entries that have explicit GRANTs are oka

[HACKERS] GRANT on functions/languages

2002-10-09 Thread Bruce Momjian
Now that we have relaxed the restriction on functions/languages, should we make sure we have GRANTS for all of them, including /contrib, or remove them all. Not knowing what we will do for 7.4, it seems we should make sure they all have GRANTs. Comments? -- Bruce Momjian