Trying to solve this problem by using a process of elimination. All
works fine until the comment below is removed.
ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY box_ops USING GiST ADD
OPERATOR 1(box,point),
OPERATOR 2(box,point),
OPERATOR 3(box,point),
OPERATOR 4(box,point),
OPERATOR 5
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 08:28:05PM +1000, Paul Matthews wrote:
Trying to solve this problem by using a process of elimination. All
works fine until the comment below is removed.
I haven't completely understood what you're trying to do, but I have a
few points.
- I don't see any definition of
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I haven't completely understood what you're trying to do
Putting in place the missing 'box op point' and 'point op box'
operators. The problematic queries are at the bottom of the email.
- I don't see any definition of an operator class, just the family,
Paul Matthews p...@netspace.net.au writes:
The C function? No it seems OK as well. What am I missing?
Did you teach the opclass's consistent() function about these new
operators?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 09:42:57PM +1000, Paul Matthews wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
I haven't completely understood what you're trying to do
Putting in place the missing 'box op point' and 'point op box'
operators. The problematic queries are at the bottom of the email.
If
Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org writes:
If you want index support, you need to go the whole way, and setup an
appropriate operator class for (box,point).
No, I think he's doing the right thing by adding these cross-type
operators loose in the opfamily. An operator class is the subset
