On 29 March 2013 15:05, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
>> time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
>> 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
>
>> https://commit
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> - sepgsql: db_schema:search permission and sepgsql: db_procedure:execute
> permission:
> Not much review afaics.
> => looks unfair, but unless some comitter (robert?) takes it
> on I don't see much alternative to booting it to the ne
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> - Index based regexp search for pg_trgm:
>Seems like the patch is undergoing restructuring of the regex access API
> => move to next fest
>
Last proposal of regex API by Tom seems simple enough in implementation for
me. I'm going to po
On Friday, March 29, 2013 11:04 PM Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-03-29 12:28:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Andres Freund writes:
> > > On 2013-03-29 10:15:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > >> What is a reasonable timeframe to target for completion of these
> items?
> >
> > > Here's my take on it
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> - pg_stat_statements: query, session, and eviction identification:
> Seems to need at least docs
> => wait for author, seems to be easy enough?
I would have responded by now, but recent events have unfortunately
made me put a lot of thi
On 2013/03/30, at 2:33, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-03-29 12:28:59 -0400, Tom Lane
>
>>> - REINDEX CONCURRENTLY:
>>> Imo pretty close to being comittable and pretty useful, but it got
>>> redesigned pretty late and it mostly had review from me and fujii and
>>> it could use a bit more in
Hello
> - plpgsql_check_function:
> Tom says (27661.1364267...@sss.pgh.pa.us) that even if the approach
> can be aggreed uppon it needs quite a bit more work
> => move
>
>
Can we talk about this patch little bit more before moving to next
commitfest?
I would to have some plan to next commi
On 2013-03-29 12:28:59 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund writes:
> > On 2013-03-29 10:15:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> What is a reasonable timeframe to target for completion of these items?
>
> > Here's my take on it:
>
> Thanks for annotating these! I've commented on the ones where I
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:05:46AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
> > Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
> > time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
> > 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
>
>
Andres Freund writes:
> On 2013-03-29 10:15:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What is a reasonable timeframe to target for completion of these items?
> Here's my take on it:
Thanks for annotating these! I've commented on the ones where I
come to a different conclusion:
> - replace plugins dire
Magnus Hagander writes:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Next week is going to be tied up with the back-branch releases, but
>> maybe we could target beta for the week after? The main gating factor
>> at this point really would be how quickly we could write some draft
>> rel
On 03/29/2013 11:05 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian writes:
Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
https://commitfest.postgr
On 2013-03-29 10:15:42 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
> time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
> 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
Very much agreed!
> https://commitf
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian writes:
>> Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
>> time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
>> 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
>
>> https
Bruce Momjian writes:
> Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
> time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
> 25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=17
Our final 9.3 commit-fest has has exceeded the two-month mark, so it is
time to start targeting a date to close it and get to 9.3 beta. I see
25 items will needing attention before we can close it:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view?id=17
What is a reasonable timefr
16 matches
Mail list logo
