On Thu, 2 Jul 2009, Robert Haas wrote:
I think it's important to clarify the distinction between when a
committer is planning to look at the patch but maybe somebody else
should too, and when the committer is planning to take exclusive
responsibility for the patch and nobody else should bother
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:29:58 Robert Haas wrote:
>> If you are taking a look at
>> any of the patches submitted for this CommitFest, please put your name
>> next to them on the wiki. Please ALSO add a comment saying something
>> like "t
On Thursday 02 July 2009 05:29:58 Robert Haas wrote:
> If you are taking a look at
> any of the patches submitted for this CommitFest, please put your name
> next to them on the wiki. Please ALSO add a comment saying something
> like "tgl says: I am reviewing this, no need to assign a round-robin
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Let the breakage begin ...
>
> regards, tom lane
Tom - and all other committers -
In order to avoid duplication of effort, we should avoid assigning
round-robin reviewers to any patches which the committers feel that
they al
Let the breakage begin ...
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers