I fixed the patch and now it compiles in windows.
The first one did not compile because there were some problems in the
Makefile.
It is currently available for download at
http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/.
Regards,
Alfranio
---(end of broadcast)
True, I think we need hooks for both methods.On 12/8/05, Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/8/2005 2:05 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:33:59AM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:>> On Wednesday 07 December 2005 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:>> > Christopher Kings-Lynne <
[EMAIL PR
On 12/8/2005 2:05 PM, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:33:59AM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone remember this patch?
> > http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlho
; Tom
Lane; Christopher Kings-Lynne
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] HOOKS for
Synchronous Replication?
On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more valuable to
provide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-tr
On 12/8/05, Jim C. Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While this code might be useful, whouldn't it be much more valuable toprovide hooks into xlog so that we could do non-trigger-basedreplication? (As well as non-trigger-based materialized views...)
If we're going to do hooks for replication, I thi
On 12/7/2005 11:24 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Anyone remember this patch?
http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
The discussion seems to be pretty minimal:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00859.php
Does anyone see a n
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:33:59AM -0800, Darcy Buskermolen wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 December 2005 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Anyone remember this patch?
> > > http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
> > > The discussion seems to be
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone remember this patch?
> > http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
> > The discussion seems to be pretty minimal:
> > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg0
I can only add that patched code did not build on windows, contacted author
about that and never got an answer back.
Regards
paolo
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto
> Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Anyone remember this patch?
> > http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community
Christopher Kings-Lynne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyone remember this patch?
> http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
> The discussion seems to be pretty minimal:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00859.php
> Does anyone see a need to investigate it further?
I
Anyone remember this patch?
http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/pgsqlhooks/
The discussion seems to be pretty minimal:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-06/msg00859.php
Does anyone see a need to investigate it further?
Chris
---(end of broadcast)-
Alfranio Correia Junior wrote:
I think it is ok now.
However, I corrected the indentation manually.
I could not run some of the tools, namely the "entab".
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.3/include/varargs.h:4:2: #error
"GCC no longer implements ."
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/3.3.3
First of all your patch does not conform with the project style. Please
have a look at how other files are indented, in particular regarding
brace position and ereport() arguments (any function arguments really,
but in ereport your problems are more visible). Also, always use
ereport() for use
Thank you for the comments.
First of all your patch does not conform with the project style. Please
have a look at how other files are indented, in particular regarding
brace position and ereport() arguments (any function arguments really,
but in ereport your problems are more visible). Also,
On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Alfranio Correia Junior wrote:
Alfranio,
The implementation of a set of hooks for efficient synchronous replication
without extensive patching of Postgresql source is now available at:
http://gorda.d
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 11:03:45AM +0100, Alfranio Correia Junior wrote:
Alfranio,
> The implementation of a set of hooks for efficient synchronous replication
> without extensive patching of Postgresql source is now available at:
>
> http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/
Some random come
Hi,
The implementation of a set of hooks for efficient synchronous replication
without extensive patching of Postgresql source is now available at:
http://gorda.di.uminho.pt/community/
Note that this is far from a full replication product. It is made available
for early feedback by t
17 matches
Mail list logo
