Alvaro Herrera writes:
> More interesting, however, is the fact that the XMAX_COMMITTED bit is
> never set either. I guess the rows are deleted by a different mechanism
> (tuptoaster probably) -- it isn't obvious how this works just by looking
> at tqual.c. It seems to do nothing at all.
I have
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> I notice that HeapTupleSatisfiesToast is not setting the
> HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED bit, though it is reading it. Is there a reason for
> this? It seems to me that it'd make sense to have it set ... unless
> it's set by some other routine, somehow?
Hmm ... I wonder if that h
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
wrote:
>
> Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of mié sep 21 16:02:34 -0300 2011:
>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I notice that HeapTupleSatisfiesToast is not setting the
>> > HEAP_XMIN_COMMIT
Excerpts from Merlin Moncure's message of mié sep 21 16:02:34 -0300 2011:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I notice that HeapTupleSatisfiesToast is not setting the
> > HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED bit, though it is reading it. Is there a reason for
> > this?
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:03 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I notice that HeapTupleSatisfiesToast is not setting the
> HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED bit, though it is reading it. Is there a reason for
> this? It seems to me that it'd make sense to have it set ... unless
> it's set by some other rou
Hi,
I notice that HeapTupleSatisfiesToast is not setting the
HEAP_XMIN_COMMITTED bit, though it is reading it. Is there a reason for
this? It seems to me that it'd make sense to have it set ... unless
it's set by some other routine, somehow?
--
Álvaro Herrera
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mail
