On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 05:37:51PM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
> Anthony,
>
> I'm reviewing your book :). One of the reasons that I want to add this
> support is because, in your recipies, it's obvious that PostgreSQL is
> lacking in this area... likewise, we've had several EDB requests for
> hi
ostgresql.org; Jonah H. HarrisSubject: Re: [HACKERS] Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...
Jonah,> Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et al., have you guys used the patch?> If so, what comments do you have as to what you'd like to see.Unfortunately, yes I have. I had to help several users
D]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 3:05 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Cc: Anthony Molinaro
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...
Anthony,
> also, while I got your ear. I bugged Simon about this
> earlier this year and was wondering if you guys are s
Anthony,
> also, while I got your ear. I bugged Simon about this
> earlier this year and was wondering if you guys are still
> planning on added the window functions added to the '03 standard?
>
> I have a ton of recipes that use them and if you guys are still
> planning on implementing them, I'd
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:43 PM
To: Anthony Molinaro
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...
Anthony,
> So is postgresql going into the direction of WITH or CONNECT BY (or
> both)?
Anthony,
> So is postgresql going into the direction of WITH or CONNECT BY (or
> both)?
PostgreSQL would do ONLY "with". We're not interested in
Oracle-proprietary syntax.
That being said, there is a CONNECT_BY() function in /contrib/tablefunc.
But this would never be part of the core synta
--
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Josh Berkus
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2005 2:02 PM
To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; Jonah H. Harris
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...
Jonah,
> Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et al., have y
Jonah,
> Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et al., have you guys used the patch?
> If so, what comments do you have as to what you'd like to see.
Unfortunately, yes I have. I had to help several users who got burned by
it: the patch was buggy as all-get out. For example, it wouldn't access
TOAS
"Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Evgen Potemkin has granted me a BSD license on the patch for hierarchical
> queries (WITH and CONNECT BY) and I'd like to get it on track for PostgreSQ=
> L
> 8.2. Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et al., have you guys used the patch?
If this is the
Alvaro,
I agree, there are some things that need to be done before calling it a
done-deal including some planning, commenting, optimizer stuff,
etc. Also, for PostgreSQL reasons, I agree that supporting
ANSI/ISO WITH is the best option; I'm willing to take on implementation
for both if you guys w
On Thu, Sep 22, 2005 at 11:19:13AM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
Hi,
> Evgen Potemkin has granted me a BSD license on the patch for hierarchical
> queries (WITH and CONNECT BY) and I'd like to get it on track for PostgreSQL
> 8.2. Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et al., have you guys used the pa
Hey everyone,
Evgen Potemkin has granted me a BSD license on the patch for
hierarchical queries (WITH and CONNECT BY) and I'd like to get it on
track for PostgreSQL 8.2. Tom, Bruce, Simon, Alvaro, Josh, et
al., have you guys used the patch? If so, what comments do you
have as to what you'd like
12 matches
Mail list logo
