Re: [HACKERS] HotStandby-Patch and WAL_DEBUG

2009-02-10 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 15:17 +0100, Bernd Helmle wrote: > I'm currently testing HotStandby v9g. > > Seems like this patch version misses to update guc.c, which still > references XLOG_DEBUG when compiled with WAL_DEBUG. This got replaced with > XLOG_DEBUG_FLUSH, *_BGFLUSH and *_REDO, resulting i

[HACKERS] HotStandby-Patch and WAL_DEBUG

2009-02-10 Thread Bernd Helmle
I'm currently testing HotStandby v9g. Seems like this patch version misses to update guc.c, which still references XLOG_DEBUG when compiled with WAL_DEBUG. This got replaced with XLOG_DEBUG_FLUSH, *_BGFLUSH and *_REDO, resulting in a compile error. Maybe we want to reflect those changes with n