高增琦 wrote:
> : (
>
> still don't know how to build ossp-uuid on windows with MSVC.
> Saito san's patch doesn't fix all errors during compiling...
I don't understand why you want to build that specific module on Windows.
Doesn't Windows have its own UUID generator that you can access, using a
smal
: (
still don't know how to build ossp-uuid on windows with MSVC.
Saito san's patch doesn't fix all errors during compiling...
I will try to combine this patch and the win32build on sf.net
Same questions again:
How was the dll file in the community binary built?
How to avoid duplicate UUIDs then
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Garick Hamlin
wrote:
>> I think using /dev/urandom directly would be surprising. At least it
would
>> have probably have taken me a while to figure out what was depleting the
>> entropy pool here.
>
> Perhaps s
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Garick Hamlin wrote:
> I think using /dev/urandom directly would be surprising. At least it would
> have probably have taken me a while to figure out what was depleting the
> entropy pool here.
Perhaps so; a bigger problem IMHO is that it's not portable. I think
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Garick Hamlin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:59:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Garick Hamlin wrote:
>> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:54:14PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
>> >> From: "Robert Haas"
>> >>> ISTM that the biggest proble
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 01:59:04PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Garick Hamlin wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:54:14PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> >> From: "Robert Haas"
> >>> ISTM that the biggest problem is that we don't have a random number
> >>> generator which
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Garick Hamlin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:54:14PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
>> From: "Robert Haas"
>>> ISTM that the biggest problem is that we don't have a random number
>>> generator which generates enough bits of randomness to implement
>>> uuid_generate_v3.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 09:54:14PM +0900, MauMau wrote:
> From: "Robert Haas"
>> ISTM that the biggest problem is that we don't have a random number
>> generator which generates enough bits of randomness to implement
>> uuid_generate_v3. I think relatively few people would cry if we
>> didn't sup
On 10/30/13, 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera writes:
>> At this point, I think we need to consider ossp-uuid as dead code.
>
> Yeah, but what shall we replace it with?
One possibility:
https://github.com/petere/pglibuuid
Not sure whether that has a chance of working on Windows.
--
From: "Robert Haas"
ISTM that the biggest problem is that we don't have a random number
generator which generates enough bits of randomness to implement
uuid_generate_v3. I think relatively few people would cry if we
didn't support uuid_generate_v1(), and the others all look simple
enough, prov
On 2013-10-31 08:22:14 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > "MauMau" writes:
> > Note the lack of enthusiasm for taking on maintainership of the OSSP
> > code. Pushing it into core would mean that we're buying into that
> > maintainership, hook line an
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "MauMau" writes:
>> From: "Tom Lane"
>>> Yeah, but what shall we replace it with? And can we preserve the
>>> API contrib/uuid-ossp offers? (Maybe we shouldn't even try, but
>>> just deprecate that module and start fresh.)
>
>> Would it be wel
"MauMau" writes:
> From: "Tom Lane"
>> Yeah, but what shall we replace it with? And can we preserve the
>> API contrib/uuid-ossp offers? (Maybe we shouldn't even try, but
>> just deprecate that module and start fresh.)
> Would it be welcomed in this community if a patch for built-in UUID
> ge
From: "Tom Lane"
Alvaro Herrera writes:
At this point, I think we need to consider ossp-uuid as dead code.
Yeah, but what shall we replace it with? And can we preserve the
API contrib/uuid-ossp offers? (Maybe we shouldn't even try, but
just deprecate that module and start fresh.)
Would i
From: "Hiroshi Saito"
it my bug patch applied to ver 1.6.2sorry..
then, I made the next patch is there, please see,
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
I will be adjusted and Ralf-san again.
Thanks. Yes, I wrote the wrong URL and meant this one. Is this patch
(uuid-1.6.2_win32_p
On 10/30/2013 12:43 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Alvaro Herrera writes:
At this point, I think we need to consider ossp-uuid as dead code.
Yeah, but what shall we replace it with? And can we preserve the
API contrib/uuid-ossp offers? (Maybe we shouldn't even try, but
just deprecate that module and s
Alvaro Herrera writes:
> At this point, I think we need to consider ossp-uuid as dead code.
Yeah, but what shall we replace it with? And can we preserve the
API contrib/uuid-ossp offers? (Maybe we shouldn't even try, but
just deprecate that module and start fresh.)
rega
Hiroshi Saito escribió:
> Hi MauMau-san
>
> it my bug patch applied to ver 1.6.2sorry..
> then, I made the next patch is there, please see,
> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
>
> I will be adjusted and Ralf-san again.
At this point, I think we need to consider ossp-uuid as dead cod
Hi MauMau-san
it my bug patch applied to ver 1.6.2sorry..
then, I made the next patch is there, please see,
http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/OSSP_win32/
I will be adjusted and Ralf-san again.
best regards,
Hiroshi Saito
(2013/10/30 21:45), MauMau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> # Sorry, Saito san' addre
Hello,
# Sorry, Saito san' address doesn't seem to exist, so excuse for sending
again
For a certain reason, I need to build PostgreSQL on Windows with OSSP UUID
support to use UUID for primary keys. I have to use Visual Studio 2010.
The original source code for OSSP UUID and its fork for W
Hello,
For a certain reason, I need to build PostgreSQL on Windows with OSSP UUID
support to use UUID for primary keys. I have to use Visual Studio 2010.
The original source code for OSSP UUID and its fork for Windows can be
downloaded from:
http://www.ossp.org/pkg/lib/uuid/
http://sourcef
21 matches
Mail list logo
