On Sunday 15 June 2008 23:01:16 Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to
see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors
are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsors in
David Fetter wrote:
I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature, per my
TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa.
This describes how to *develop* a feature, not how to *sponsor* it. I don't
think this addresses the issues brought up
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
features, todos and bug fixes.
I think the professional support company listing is already that list.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
features, todos and bug fixes.
I think the professional support company listing is already
Greg Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
features, todos and bug fixes.
I think the professional support
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 12:24:28AM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature, per my
TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa.
This describes how to *develop* a feature, not
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
features, todos and bug fixes.
I think the professional support company listing is already that list.
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to
see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors
are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsors in
picking a development company to deal with.
+1
Joshua
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
David Fetter wrote:
I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature, per my
TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa.
This describes how to *develop* a feature, not how to *sponsor* it. I
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need
to deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the
development, the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods
and times of payment, etc.
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to
deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development,
the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of
payment, etc.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we
need to
deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the
development,
the sponsor's relationship with the
Decibel! wrote:
So were there decisions in the dev meeting about how the community wants
to handle people wanting to sponsor a project? Do they donate to SPI? Do
we have an escrow fund? Do we just point them at one of the Postgres
Companies and hope they're willing to pay for the whole
Decibel! wrote:
On Jun 12, 2008, at 8:49 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Greg Smith wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to
deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development,
the sponsor's
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Incidentally, we have minutes from the meeting. Is it OK to publish
them openly?
There's a set of minutes already up at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2008_Developer_Meeting
There was no solution proposed to the escrow problem, nor to
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:27 -0400, Greg Smith wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Incidentally, we have minutes from the meeting. Is it OK to publish
them openly?
There's a set of minutes already up at
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PgCon_2008_Developer_Meeting
Folks,
I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature, per my
TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. Sorry about that.
Anyhow, Jignesh has come up with a proposal template
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/ProposalTemplate that could use
David Fetter wrote:
Folks,
I forgot to post the fact that I'd put up a
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/How_to_sponsor_a_feature, per my
TODO from the developers' meeting in Ottawa. Sorry about that.
Anyhow, Jignesh has come up with a proposal template
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
If we want to help people to sponsor features, then I think we need to
deal with subjects like finding someone to undertake the development,
the sponsor's relationship with the developer, methods and times of
payment, etc.
The bit on the wiki is
19 matches
Mail list logo
