Re: [HACKERS] INSERT rule

2004-06-29 Thread Darko Prenosil
Maybe it would be even possible to write single generic function that can update any view. Regards ! - Original Message - From: "Jonathan Gardner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darko Prenosil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 8:22 PM Subject: Re:

Re: [HACKERS] INSERT rule

2004-06-29 Thread Darko Prenosil
God, that was so obvious ! Thanks (again). Regards ! - Original Message - From: "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Darko Prenosil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2004 4:18 PM Subject: Re: [HACKERS] INSERT rul

Re: [HACKERS] INSERT rule

2004-06-29 Thread Tom Lane
Darko Prenosil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just wrote a function that takes view name as argument and generates INSERT, > UPDATE and DELETE rules for that view. It is working OK (thanks to Tom), but > I have trouble with INSERT rule. > When inserting directly into table, default values are fil

[HACKERS] INSERT rule

2004-06-29 Thread Darko Prenosil
Just wrote a function that takes view name as argument and generates INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE rules for that view. It is working OK (thanks to Tom), but I have trouble with INSERT rule. When inserting directly into table, default values are filled in when the field is not in the insert target