Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oleg Bartunov writes: Someone said that the conversion table is actually koi8r + koi8u, being different from IANA's koi8_r. Not sure though. I found mention in the archives by Oleg B. that it is in fact koi8_r. on my system (linux) I have ru_RU.KOI8-R locale. We're not talking

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tatsuo Ishii writes: The conversion named SJIS is different from IANA's shift_jis. It actually matches Windows-31J in IANA, which is too ugly to being emploied as our conversion name, IMO. OK I agree with win1250 - windows_1250, win1251 - windows_1251, but do not agree with renaming

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-19 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: Tatsuo Ishii writes: The conversion named SJIS is different from IANA's shift_jis. It actually matches Windows-31J in IANA, which is too ugly to being emploied as our conversion name, IMO. OK I agree with win1250 - windows_1250, win1251 -

[HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I thought you had named the conversion functions after the IANA names. I found the following inconsistencies, however: sjis should be shift_jis win1250 should be windows_1250 (similarly 866, 1251) koi8r should be koi8_r I think we should fix this now. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-18 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
I thought you had named the conversion functions after the IANA names. I found the following inconsistencies, however: sjis should be shift_jis The conversion named SJIS is different from IANA's shift_jis. It actually matches Windows-31J in IANA, which is too ugly to being emploied as our