Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Oleg Bartunov writes: > > > Someone said that the conversion table is actually koi8r + koi8u, > > > being different from IANA's koi8_r. Not sure though. > > > > I found mention in the archives by Oleg B. that it is in fact koi8_r. > > > > on my system (linux) I have ru_RU.KOI8-R locale. We're no

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-19 Thread Oleg Bartunov
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tatsuo Ishii writes: > > > The conversion named "SJIS" is different from IANA's "shift_jis". It > > actually matches "Windows-31J" in IANA, which is too ugly to being > > emploied as our conversion name, IMO. > > OK > > > I agree with win1250 -> wind

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-19 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Tatsuo Ishii writes: > The conversion named "SJIS" is different from IANA's "shift_jis". It > actually matches "Windows-31J" in IANA, which is too ugly to being > emploied as our conversion name, IMO. OK > I agree with win1250 -> windows_1250, win1251 -> windows_1251, but do > not agree with re

Re: [HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-18 Thread Tatsuo Ishii
> I thought you had named the conversion functions after the IANA names. I > found the following inconsistencies, however: > > sjis should be shift_jis The conversion named "SJIS" is different from IANA's "shift_jis". It actually matches "Windows-31J" in IANA, which is too ugly to being emploie

[HACKERS] Inconsistent Conversion Names

2002-09-18 Thread Peter Eisentraut
I thought you had named the conversion functions after the IANA names. I found the following inconsistencies, however: sjis should be shift_jis win1250 should be windows_1250 (similarly 866, 1251) koi8r should be koi8_r I think we should fix this now. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED]