On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 08:04:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
So I'm pretty strongly inclined to just dike out the limit. If you're
running a database big enough to hit the existing limit, you can well
afford to put more memory into the catcache.
If you do a \d, does that load every tuple from
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
If you do a \d, does that load every tuple from pg_class into the
catcache?
Many of 'em, not sure about all.
regards, tom lane
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: Have you
Awhile back, there was a discussion about psql \d display being really
slow in a database with 4000 tables:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-09/msg01085.php
I looked into this some, and it seems that part of the problem is that
the catalog caches are limited to hold no more than
I am thinking we should scale it based on max_fsm_relations.
---
Tom Lane wrote:
Awhile back, there was a discussion about psql \d display being really
slow in a database with 4000 tables:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I am thinking we should scale it based on max_fsm_relations.
Hmm ... tables are not the only factor in the required catcache size,
and max_fsm_relations tells more about the total installation size
than the number of tables in your particular
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
I am thinking we should scale it based on max_fsm_relations.
Hmm ... tables are not the only factor in the required catcache size,
and max_fsm_relations tells more about the total installation size
than the number of tables in
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I just thought of a more radical idea: do we need a limit on catcache
size at all? On normal size databases I believe that we never hit
5000 entries at all (at least, last time I ran the CATCACHE_STATS code
on the regression tests,
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian pgman@candle.pha.pa.us writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
I just thought of a more radical idea: do we need a limit on catcache
size at all? On normal size databases I believe that we never hit
5000 entries at all (at least, last time I ran the CATCACHE_STATS code
on
