> That seems like a nonstarter :-(. Index-only scans don't have a license
> to return approximations. If we drop the behavior for circles, how much
> functionality do we have left?
It should work with exact operator classes, box_ops, point_ops,
range_ops, inet_ops.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers m
Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> For a circle, the GiST index stores a bounding box of the circle. The
> new fetch function reverses that, calculating the radius and center of
> the circle from the bounding box.
> Those conversions lose some precision due to rounding. Are we okay with
> that?
Tha
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 2:55 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
wrote:
> On 07/21/2014 10:47 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
>>
>> Hi, hackers!
>> There are new results of my work on GSoC project "Index-only scans for
>> GIST".
>> Previous post is here:
>>
>> http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-onl
On 07/21/2014 10:47 PM, Anastasia Lubennikova wrote:
Hi, hackers!
There are new results of my work on GSoC project "Index-only scans for
GIST".
Previous post is here:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-only-scans-for-GIST-td5804892.html
Repository is
https://github.com/lubennikovaav/p
Hi, hackers!
There are new results of my work on GSoC project "Index-only scans for
GIST".
Previous post is here:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Index-only-scans-for-GIST-td5804892.html
Repository is
https://github.com/lubennikovaav/postgres/tree/indexonlygist2
Patch is in attachments.
It
