Re: [HACKERS] Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?

2005-09-30 Thread Tom Lane
Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (Maybe we should audit it for security problems, just in case the > distributors choose to include it in packages. The temp file usage for > $TMPFILE looks "predictable," thus maybe it _is_ insecure. Apparently > it can be made to clobber any existing

Re: [HACKERS] Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?

2005-09-30 Thread Alvaro Herrera
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 03:24:15PM +0200, Fabien COELHO wrote: > > Dear Tom, > > >While testing the recent pgxs patch, I noticed that you can build and > >install contrib with PGXS: > >... > >It seems that it ought to work to run installcheck too: > > gmake USE_PGXS=1 installcheck > >but this

Re: [HACKERS] Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?

2005-09-30 Thread Fabien COELHO
Dear Tom, While testing the recent pgxs patch, I noticed that you can build and install contrib with PGXS: ... It seems that it ought to work to run installcheck too: gmake USE_PGXS=1 installcheck but this does not quite work because the pg_regress script isn't included in the installat

[HACKERS] Install pg_regress script to support PGXS?

2005-09-27 Thread Tom Lane
While testing the recent pgxs patch, I noticed that you can build and install contrib with PGXS: cd contrib gmake USE_PGXS=1 all gmake USE_PGXS=1 install It seems that it ought to work to run installcheck too: gmake USE_PGXS=1 installcheck but this does not quite wor