Bruce Momjian wrote:
I assume this will not be completed for 7.4. I will keep the emails for
7.5.
One idea I had was to use the existing sort_mem parameter to control
when to force the deferred trigger queue to disk --- it doesn't have
anything to do with sorting, but it does have the same
I assume this will not be completed for 7.4. I will keep the emails for
7.5.
One idea I had was to use the existing sort_mem parameter to control
when to force the deferred trigger queue to disk --- it doesn't have
anything to do with sorting, but it does have the same purpose, to force
thing
Stuart, were are on this patch? Seems we need GUC additions, though I
can do that for you, and changes to write the head to disk. Was that
completed?
---
Stuart wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a side question, it looks to me that the code stores the first trigger
records in memory and then after some point starts storing all new records
on disk. Is this correct? I'd wonder if that's really what you want in
general, since I'd
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Stuart wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a side question, it looks to me that the code stores the first trigger
records in memory and then after some point starts storing all new records
on disk. Is this correct? I'd wonder if that's
Stuart wrote:
Tom Lane wrote:
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a side question, it looks to me that the code stores the first trigger
records in memory and then after some point starts storing all new records
on disk. Is this correct? I'd wonder if that's really what you want in
Hi,
I noticed the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00366.php
isn't in the patch queue. Is the patch OK?
If not please say what is wrong with it.
Thank you,
- Stuart
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 2: you can get off all
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, deststar wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00366.php
isn't in the patch queue. Is the patch OK?
I think it was just that Bruce hasn't gotten to it.
If not please say what is wrong with it.
I just checked out a new
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, Stephan Szabo wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, deststar wrote:
Hi,
I noticed the patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-06/msg00366.php
isn't in the patch queue. Is the patch OK?
I think it was just that Bruce hasn't gotten to it.
If not please
Stephan Szabo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As a side question, it looks to me that the code stores the first trigger
records in memory and then after some point starts storing all new records
on disk. Is this correct? I'd wonder if that's really what you want in
general, since I'd think that
10 matches
Mail list logo