Le 24/07/2017 à 21:18, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Gilles Darold writes:
>> Le 24/07/2017 à 19:19, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>> ... I'm inclined to think in terms of fixing it at that level
>>> rather than in pg_dump. It doesn't look like it would be hard to fix:
>>> both functions ultimately call get_query_d
Gilles Darold writes:
> Le 24/07/2017 à 19:19, Tom Lane a écrit :
>> ... I'm inclined to think in terms of fixing it at that level
>> rather than in pg_dump. It doesn't look like it would be hard to fix:
>> both functions ultimately call get_query_def(), it's just that one passes
>> down a tuple
Le 24/07/2017 à 19:19, Tom Lane a écrit :
> Gilles Darold writes:
>> There is an issue with version prior to 10 when dumping views with circular
>> references. I know that these views are now exported as views in 10 but they
>> are still exported as TABLE + RULE in prior versions. This conduct to
Gilles Darold writes:
> There is an issue with version prior to 10 when dumping views with circular
> references. I know that these views are now exported as views in 10 but they
> are still exported as TABLE + RULE in prior versions. This conduct to the
> following error when columns of sub-queri
Hi,
There is an issue with version prior to 10 when dumping views with circular
references. I know that these views are now exported as views in 10 but they
are still exported as TABLE + RULE in prior versions. This conduct to the
following error when columns of sub-queries doesn't have the same a
