Re: [HACKERS] JSON data type status?

2011-01-21 Thread Joseph Adams
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: >> What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1? > > Nothing will happen in 9.1. > I assume we are in "competition" status: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hacke

Re: [HACKERS] JSON data type status?

2011-01-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
Itagaki Takahiro wrote: > On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1? > > Nothing will happen in 9.1. > I assume we are in "competition" status: > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00481.php > > Al

Re: [HACKERS] JSON data type status?

2011-01-20 Thread Itagaki Takahiro
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote: > What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1? Nothing will happen in 9.1. I assume we are in "competition" status: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00481.php Also, if PGXN will work well, we might not h

[HACKERS] JSON data type status?

2011-01-20 Thread Bruce Momjian
What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1? -- Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + It's impossible for everything to be true. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)