On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Itagaki Takahiro
wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1?
>
> Nothing will happen in 9.1.
> I assume we are in "competition" status:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hacke
Itagaki Takahiro wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1?
>
> Nothing will happen in 9.1.
> I assume we are in "competition" status:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00481.php
>
> Al
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 09:11, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1?
Nothing will happen in 9.1.
I assume we are in "competition" status:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-11/msg00481.php
Also, if PGXN will work well, we might not h
What happened to our work to add a JSON data type for PG 9.1?
--
Bruce Momjian http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)