On 10/13/2014 10:39 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
A JsonSemAction sem is not well initialized
a array_element_start is not initialized and enforces sigfault on my comp
*** ./utils/adt/jsonb.c.orig2014-10-13 16:37:00.479708142 +0200
--- ./utils/adt/jsonb.c2014-10-13 16:36:33.704650644 +0
2014-10-13 15:45 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan :
>
> On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am working on review of this patch.
>>
>
>
> The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
> to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a techniq
Hi
A JsonSemAction sem is not well initialized
a array_element_start is not initialized and enforces sigfault on my comp
*** ./utils/adt/jsonb.c.orig2014-10-13 16:37:00.479708142 +0200
--- ./utils/adt/jsonb.c2014-10-13 16:36:33.704650644 +0200
***
*** 786,791
--- 786,793
2014-10-13 16:19 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane :
> Pavel Stehule writes:
> > I checked this last version - warning is out, but SIGFAULT on jsonb test
> is
> > there .. I rechecked it with clang compiler, but result is same
>
> Stack trace please?
>
(gdb) bt
#0 0x0072 in ?? ()
#1 0x008
Pavel Stehule writes:
> I checked this last version - warning is out, but SIGFAULT on jsonb test is
> there .. I rechecked it with clang compiler, but result is same
Stack trace please?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.
2014-10-13 15:45 GMT+02:00 Andrew Dunstan :
>
> On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am working on review of this patch.
>>
>
>
> The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
> to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a techniq
On 10/13/2014 06:41 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
The patch attached to the message you are replying to was never intended
to be reviewed. It was only given by way of illustration of a technique.
The original patch to be reviewed is on the message
Hi
I am working on review of this patch.
There is new warnings:
jsonb.c: In function ‘jsonb_agg_transfn’:
jsonb.c:1540:20: warning: assignment makes pointer from integer without a
cast
v.val.numeric = DirectFunctionCall1(numeric_uplus,
NumericGetDatum(v.val.numeric));
^
On 09/23/2014 12:23 PM, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
Hi all,
I'm faced with some troubles about the jsonb implementation, and I
hope I'll get little advice =)
If I understand correctly, an abstract function for jsonb modification
should have the following stages:
Jsonb -> JsonbValue -> Modification
Hi all,
I'm faced with some troubles about the jsonb implementation, and I hope
I'll get little advice =)
If I understand correctly, an abstract function for jsonb modification
should have the following stages:
Jsonb -> JsonbValue -> Modification -> JsonbValue -> Jsonb
One can convert the *Jsonb
10 matches
Mail list logo