Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos as source of user name? (Re: [BUGS] segfault in psql on x86_64)

2004-02-08 Thread Tom Lane
Greg Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In fact I think there's something a little backwards about deciding on a > default username in advance and then trying various authentication methods. Perhaps, but we're stuck with that without a massive (and non backwards compatible) redesign of the connec

Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos as source of user name? (Re: [BUGS] segfault in psql on x86_64)

2004-02-08 Thread Greg Stark
Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Orion Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > It appears to be faulting on a kerberos call which is odd because I > > don't use kerberos for anything. > > I was a bit surprised to realize that if you compile Kerberos support at > all, libpq will try to get a u

[HACKERS] Kerberos as source of user name? (Re: [BUGS] segfault in psql on x86_64)

2004-01-31 Thread Tom Lane
Orion Henry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It appears to be faulting on a kerberos call which is odd because I > don't use kerberos for anything. I was a bit surprised to realize that if you compile Kerberos support at all, libpq will try to get a user name from Kerberos in preference to using getp