On Mon, 2008-06-23 at 17:38 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Is this fixed and this block of code can be removed?
There'll be some action for the next CommitFest.
--
Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pg
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Gregory Stark wrote:
> > >
> > > There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a
> > > kludge
> > > added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
> > > expense:
> > >
> > > #ifdef WIN32
> > > /*
> > >
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a
> > kludge
> > added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
> > expense:
> >
> > #ifdef WIN32
> > /*
> > * Windows reports that the fi
I have moved this to the next commit-fest.
---
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a kludge
> added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
;
> Sent: 08-04-07, 1:54:37
> Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Kludge in pg_standby.c
>
> Magnus, have you looked at this yet?
>
> ---
>
> Gregory Stark wrote:
> >
> > There's a suspicious ifdef
Magnus, have you looked at this yet?
---
Gregory Stark wrote:
>
> There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a kludge
> added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
> exp
There's a suspicious ifdef in pg_standby for WIN32 which smells like a kludge
added to work around a Windows problem which makes it work but at great
expense:
#ifdef WIN32
/*
* Windows reports that the file has the right number of bytes
* even tho
