Patch applied. Thanks.
Backpatched to 8.1.X.
---
Stephen Frost wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> * Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I've now tested this patch at home w/ 8.2HEAD and it seems to fix the
> > bug. I
* Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote:
> Then the patch safest for just 8.2 then.
My hope is to come up with a better patch which will be acceptable for
both 8.1.x and 8.2.. I'll try and come up with something this week. I
don't think it's a huge issue if it's not in 8.1.3 tho.
Then the patch safest for just 8.2 then.
---
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote:
> > Is this something we need for 8.1.X?
>
> Personally, I think it's a bug
* Bruce Momjian (pgman@candle.pha.pa.us) wrote:
> Is this something we need for 8.1.X?
Personally, I think it's a bug which should be fixed. I don't think
everyone agrees on that though and there are some parts which could be a
bit controversial. The main issue is that now the entire Kerberos
co
Is this something we need for 8.1.X?
---
Bruce Momjian wrote:
>
> Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
>
> http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
>
> It will be applied as
Your patch has been added to the PostgreSQL unapplied patches list at:
http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches
It will be applied as soon as one of the PostgreSQL committers reviews
and approves it.
---
St
Greetings,
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I've now tested this patch at home w/ 8.2HEAD and it seems to fix the
> bug. I plan on testing it under 8.1.2 at work tommorow with
> mod_auth_krb5, etc, and expect it'll work there. Assuming all goes
> well and unless someone objec
Greetings,
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I realize it's not entirely fair (given that it was years ago) to ask
> this, but, anyone happen to know why the patch wasn't accepted? It
> almost patched cleanly against current HEAD even. I went ahead and
> made the few changes b
* Stephen Frost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> and it's somewhat frustrating since the end of that thread is a
> reasonably small patch which fixes the problem:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2002-05/msg00083.php
Erp, not quite sure how I managed that, the end of the thre
Greetings,
I've just run smack-dab into the bug described here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-interfaces/2002-05/msg00083.php
and it's somewhat frustrating since the end of that thread is a
reasonably small patch which fixes the problem:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-int
10 matches
Mail list logo
