On Sat, 2007-04-07 at 18:09, Tom Lane wrote:
> Awhile back Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Making cluster MVCC-safe will kill my back-door of clustering a hot
> > table while I run a full DB backup.
>
> Are we agreed that the TRUNCATE-based workaround shown here
> http://archives.postgre
Tom Lane wrote:
> Awhile back Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Making cluster MVCC-safe will kill my back-door of clustering a hot
> > table while I run a full DB backup.
>
> Are we agreed that the TRUNCATE-based workaround shown here
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03
Awhile back Csaba Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Making cluster MVCC-safe will kill my back-door of clustering a hot
> table while I run a full DB backup.
Are we agreed that the TRUNCATE-based workaround shown here
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-03/msg00606.php
is an adequate