-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 17 December 2003 2:59 pm, David Felstead wrote:
David Felstead wrote:
Bah, what a way to make an entrance - I re-read Andrew's post and
realised he was talking about pg_hba.conf. My apologies. :(
Regardless, is this something that
Jonathan Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- -- Group www can only have 12 concurrent connections with the cluster.
ALTER GROUP www SET max_connections = 12;
I think group-related restrictions would be an impossible rat's nest
to define, because there's no one-to-one correspondence between
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 08:30:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
Jonathan Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- -- Group www can only have 12 concurrent connections with the cluster.
ALTER GROUP www SET max_connections = 12;
I think group-related restrictions would be an impossible rat's nest
to
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about roles? Is anybody going to attack the mixed users+groups
implementation in this development cycles?
Not me. I think Peter was making some noises about it though.
regards, tom lane
---(end of
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
Jonathan Gardner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- -- Group www can only have 12 concurrent connections with the cluster.
ALTER GROUP www SET max_connections = 12;
I think group-related restrictions would be an impossible rat's nest to
define, because
Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Tom Lane wrote:
I think group-related restrictions would be an impossible rat's nest to
define, because there's no one-to-one correspondence between backend
processes and groups.
'k, I'm a bit confused here ... we already do the
